MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2958005240 · doi:10.1109/tap.2019.2927824

Improvement of Multi-Frequency Microwave Breast Imaging through Frequency Cycling and Tissue-Dependent Mapping

2019· article· en· W2958005240 on OpenAlexafffund
Cameron Kaye, Ian Jeffrey, Joe LoVetri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, IndiaUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsMicrowaveMicrowave imagingRadio frequencyAcousticsMaterials scienceOpticsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two modifications of the Contrast Source Inversion (CSI) algorithm have been employed to improve resulting 2-D microwave images of the dielectric properties of synthetic breast models produced using a well-established frequency-hopping technique. First, while reconstructions from low-frequency data are often used as initial guesses for otherwise unstable higher-frequency inversions, an improvement in overall image quality can be observed when the imaginary part of the reconstructed low-frequency image is altered to reflect the identical tissue geometry as its real part when used as an initial guess during subsequent reconstructions. Second, in such frequency-hopping scenarios, rather than terminating reconstructions following inversions of the highest frequency data, “frequency cycling” (i.e., returning to the lowest frequency in the sequence) can be used to further improve reconstructions without loss of resolution or anatomical detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207