MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2959319687 · doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab30b4

Micropocket hydrogel devices for all-in-one formation, assembly, and analysis of aggregate-based tissues

2019· article· en· W2959319687 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiofabrication · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesCanadian Cancer Society Research InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsBiofabricationMulticellular organismAggregate (composite)ScalabilitySimple (philosophy)Biological systemNanotechnologyComputer scienceSpheroidHuman breast3D cell cultureMaterials scienceTissue engineeringBiomedical engineeringCell cultureBiologyCellCancer cellEngineeringCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multicellular aggregated tissues have grown critically important in benchtop biomedical research, both as stand-alone spheroids and when assembled into larger bioengineered constructs. However, typical systems for aggregate formation are limited in their capacity to reliably handle such cultures at various experimental stages in a broadly accessible, consistent, and scalable manner. In this work, we develop a broadly versatile all-in-one biofabrication strategy to form uniform, spherical, multicellular aggregates that can be maintained at precisely defined positions for analysis or transfer into a larger tissue. The 3D-printed MicroPocket Culture (MPoC) system consists of an array of simple geometry-based valves in a polyacrylamide hydrogel, and is able to produce hundreds of uniformly-sized aggregates in standard tissue culture well plates, using simple tools that are readily available in all standard biological wet-labs. The model breast cancer aggregates formed in these experiments are retained in defined positions on chip during all liquid handling steps required to stimulate, label, and image the experiment, enabling high-throughput studies on this culture model. Furthermore, MPoCs enable robust formation of aggregates in cell types that do not conventionally form such structures. Finally, we demonstrate that this single platform can also be used to generate complex 3D tissues from the precisely-positioned aggregate building blocks. To highlight the unique and broad versatility of this technique, we develop a simple 3D invasion assay and show that cancer cells preferentially migrate towards nearby model tumors; demonstrating the importance of spatial precision when engineering 3D tissues. Together, this platform presents a broadly accessible and uniquely capable system with which to develop advanced aggregate-based models for tissue engineering, fundamental research, and applied drug discovery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.271

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it