MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960006043 · doi:10.4000/tvseries.3420

Les épisodes autonomes : écarts formels et narratifs dans The X-Files et Buffy The Vampire Slayer

2019· article· fr· W2960006043 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTV/Series · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Games and Media
Canadian institutionsBibliothèque et Archives nationales du QuébecUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVampireHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les genres télésériels évoluent depuis l’émergence du médium, ils se raffinent, se complexifient, s’hybrident, répondant aux exigences et aux compétences spectatorielles grandissantes de son public. Les genres permettent ainsi l’émergence de formules, que l’on adopte pour mieux se les approprier, et à partir desquelles les créateurs peuvent construire la matrice qui donnera à leur œuvre sa structure unique. Entre les séries canoniques des débuts et les grands feuilletons d’aujourd’hui, les années 1990 ont donné naissance à plusieurs séries hybrides, notamment dans le sous-genre du fantastique (par exemple, The X-Files et Buffy The Vampire Slayer), qui combinent des épisodes sériels et feuilletonnants. Au cœur de ces séries se trouvent des épisodes autonomes, souvent les plus appréciés, qui s’écartent de la matrice et proposent des innovations ou des jeux fictionnels, narratifs ou transtextuels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.856
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it