MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2960901398 · doi:10.21608/cguaa.2003.40215

DETERMINATION OF HYDROTHERMAL STABILITY OF CONSOLIDATED PARCHMENT AND LEATHERS

2003· article· en· W2960901398 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œConference Book of the General Union of Arab Archaeologists/The Conference Book of the General Union of Arab Archaeologists · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicModeling, Simulation, and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParchmentHydrothermal circulationMaterials scienceEngineeringChemical engineeringArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since pre-historic times people have known have to make a material that we know as leather. In Egypt, vegetable tanned leather was used since the pre-historic period, but the use of parchment dates back to the Middle Kingdom(1). We may consider that since 1884, with the work of Augustus Schultz, thec hrome tanning process began(2). There are a large number of important parchment manuscripts and tanned leathers (vegetable and chrome tanned leather) in archaeological sites (museums, storages, old libraries and excavation areas). From the moment of its creation, parchment or leather starts to age. Ageing as such is a process resulting from damage brought about as a consequence of production technology, environmental conditions, handling and repair(3). Degradation by heat is probably one of the major factors in the deterioration of a large portion of parchment and leather in museum collections(4). There is no doubt that the first stage of any conservation process should always be a detailed study of the condition of the leather with an understanding of the deterioration process in order to present some solutions for the conservation treatment. Most leather artifacts and parchment manuscripts in Egypt usually suffer because of unsuitable environmental conditions(5). A widly used parameter for measuring the condition of parchment and leather is the shrinkage temperature, representing the temperature of which leather has to be heated in an aqueous environment in order to lose its characteristic tridimensional fibre network construction. The loss of this structure causes the leather or parchment to shrink(6). Reed, R., Ancients skins, Parchments and leathers, Seminar Press, London, 1972, p. 48. Thomson, R. S., Leather manufacture in the post medieval period withspecial references to Northamptonshire, Post Medieval Arch., London, 1981, p.161. Larsen, R., Micro methods for the analysis of parchment – MAP – preliminary report, in care and conservation of manuscripts 5, Fellows – JENSEN, Gillian and Springborg, the Royal Library, 2000, pp. 28-37. Williams, R.S., Surface encrustation on caribon skin coat, Canadian Conservation Institute, Ottawa, Canada, 1982, pp.1-14. Abdel-Maksoud, G. and Marcinkowska, E., Changes in some properties of aged and historical parchment, Restaurator, Vol. 21, Munich, 2000, p.138. Larsen, R. Experiments and observation in the study of environmental impact on historical vegetable tanned leathers, Thermochimica Acta, 2000, p.365.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it