Toward a Smart Compliant Robotic Gripper Equipped with 3D‐Designed Cellular Fingers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Usual lightweight soft robotic bodies built with elastomer materials show lack of structural stiffness that limits their use in many practical applications. Herein, an architectured robotic body design with deformable cellular structures, which is easy to fabricate, lightweight, mechanically durable, and compliant while maintaining its resilience, is proposed. The cellular body design overcomes not only the stiffness limitation but also other drawbacks of most common soft bodies that may damage from high pressure or impact. An artificial cellular finger is printed together with embedded pressure sensors on the fingertip to form a functional system in a single‐building process with the advantage of multi‐material 3D printing. The integrated architectured grippers, composed of cellular fingers with a repeatable, reliable bending profile, demonstrate maximum gripping force as 16 N on actuation, with gripping capability of various objects. 3D cellular designs open up new possibilities for architectured robotic bodies that can immensely widen their space of applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it