Mutually Coupled Switched Reluctance Motor: Fundamentals, Control, Modeling, State of the Art Review and Future Trends
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Switched reluctance motor (SRM) is gaining more interest in the last decades due to its simple and robust structure. SRMs are classified into conventional SRMs (CSRMs) and mutually coupled SRMs (MCSRMs). CSRMs are based on single-phase excitation and torque is generated by the variation of self-inductance with rotor position. MCSRMs are based on multi-phase excitation and torque is produced by the rate of change of both self- and mutual inductances. MCSRM has the advantages of using the standard voltage source inverter at balanced current operation, when the sum of the phase currents is zero, while CSRM requires an asymmetrical converter. This paper presents the state-of-the-art review of MCSRMs, including operating concept, winding, and pole configurations, control methods by using different current waveforms, performance comparison of MCSRM configurations, modeling methods, and future work for improving MCSRM performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".