MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2962903771 · doi:10.1109/tits.2018.2820044

Cooperative Vehicle Speed Fault Diagnosis and Correction

2018· article· en· W2962903771 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Pirani, Ehsan Hashemi, Amir Khajepour, Barış Fi̇dan, Bakhtiar Litkouhi, Shih-Ken Chen, Shreyas Sundaram

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Time Synchronization Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryFault (geology)CAN busEngineeringTraction control systemComputer scienceVehicle dynamicsTelecommunications networkControl engineeringFunction (biology)Traction (geology)Real-time computingAutomotive engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reliable estimation of vehicle speed is an active topic of research in the automotive industry and academia due to its technical challenges as well as applications to vehicle traction and stability control. In this direction, the emergence of new generations of communication technologies has brought new perspectives to traditional studies on vehicle speed estimation and control. To this end, this paper introduces a cooperative vehicle speed fault diagnosis and correction algorithm. The distributed part of the algorithm is based on a distributed function calculation algorithm for vehicle networks. The introduced algorithm enables each vehicle to gather some information from other vehicles in the network in a distributed manner and is robust to communication failures. A procedure to use such information for a single vehicle to diagnose and correct a possible fault in its own speed estimation/measurement is discussed. The functionality and performance of the proposed algorithms are verified via illustrative examples and simulation results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicNetwork Time Synchronization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207