On linear instability of solitary waves for the nonlinear Dirac equation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We consider the nonlinear Dirac equation, also known as the Soler model: i\partial _{t}\psi = −i\boldsymbol{\alpha } \cdot \mathbf{∇}\psi + m\beta \psi −\left(\psi ^{⁎}\beta \psi \right)^{k}\beta \psi ,\:m > 0,\:\psi (x,t) \in \mathbb{C}^{N},\:x \in \mathbb{R}^{n},\:k \in \mathbb{N}. We study the point spectrum of linearizations at small amplitude solitary waves in the limit \omega \rightarrow m , proving that if k > 2/ n , then one positive and one negative eigenvalue are present in the spectrum of the linearizations at these solitary waves with ω sufficiently close to m , so that these solitary waves are linearly unstable. The approach is based on applying the Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory to the nonrelativistic limit of the equation. The results are in formal agreement with the Vakhitov–Kolokolov stability criterion. Résumé Nous considérons l'équation de Dirac non linéaire, aussi connue comme modèle de Soler. Nous étudions le spectre ponctuel des linéarisations autour d'ondes solitaires de petite amplitude dans la limite \omega \rightarrow m , et montrons que si k > 2/ n une valeur propre positive et une négative sont présentes dans le spectre des linéarisations autour de ces ondes solitaires lorsque ω est suffisamment proche de m , ce qui entraîne que ces ondes solitaires sont linéairement instables. L'approche est basée sur l'application de la théorie des perturbations de Rayleigh–Schrödinger à la limite non relativiste de l'équation. Les résultats sont en accord formel avec le critère de stabilité de Vakhitov–Kolokolov.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it