MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963232860 · doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2017.04.002

Long-time behavior of solutions to the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation for soliton-free initial data

2017· article· fr· W2963232860 on OpenAlexafffund
Jiaqi Liu, Peter Perry, Catherine Sulem

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Waves and Solitons
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsNonlinear Schrödinger equationSolitonNonlinear systemDerivative (finance)Mathematical physicsMathematical analysisPhysicsMathematicsApplied mathematicsQuantum mechanicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The large-time behavior of solutions to the derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation is established for initial conditions in some weighted Sobolev spaces under the assumption that the initial conditions do not support solitons. Our approach uses the inverse scattering setting and the nonlinear steepest descent method of Deift and Zhou as recast by Dieng and McLaughlin. Résumé On établit le comportement au temps long des solutions de l'équation de Schrödinger nonlinéraire avec dérivée dans des espaces de Sobolev à poids, sous l'hypothèse que les conditions initiales ne supportent pas de solitons. Notre approche utilise l'inverse scattering et la méthode de la plus grande pente (“steepest descent”) nonlinéaire de Deift et Zhou revisitée par Dieng et McLaughlin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations75
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non LinéaireSame topicNonlinear Waves and SolitonsFrench-language works237,207