MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963287397 · doi:10.1145/3301446

Approximation Schemes for Clustering with Outliers

2019· article· en· W2963287397 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Algorithms · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFacility Location and Emergency Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisOutlierFacility location problemMetric (unit)Metric spaceComputer scienceOverhead (engineering)Set (abstract data type)MathematicsData pointInteger (computer science)Euclidean distanceCombinatoricsAlgorithmMathematical optimizationDiscrete mathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Clustering problems are well studied in a variety of fields, such as data science, operations research, and computer science. Such problems include variants of center location problems, k -median and k -means to name a few. In some cases, not all data points need to be clustered; some may be discarded for various reasons. For instance, some points may arise from noise in a dataset or one might be willing to discard a certain fraction of the points to avoid incurring unnecessary overhead in the cost of a clustering solution. We study clustering problems with outliers. More specifically, we look at uncapacitated facility location (UFL), k - median , and k - means . In these problems, we are given a set X of data points in a metric space δ(., .), a set C of possible centers (each maybe with an opening cost), maybe an integer parameter k , plus an additional parameter z as the number of outliers. In uncapacitated facility location with outliers, we have to open some centers, discard up to z points of X , and assign every other point to the nearest open center, minimizing the total assignment cost plus center opening costs. In k - median and k - means , we have to open up to k centers, but there are no opening costs. In k - means , the cost of assigning j to i is δ 2 ( j , i ). We present several results. Our main focus is on cases where δ is a doubling metric (this includes fixed dimensional Euclidean metrics as a special case) or is the shortest path metrics of graphs from a minor-closed family of graphs. For uniform-cost UFL with outliers on such metrics, we show that a multiswap simple local search heuristic yields a PTAS. With a bit more work, we extend this to bicriteria approximations for the k - median and k - means problems in the same metrics where, for any constant ϵ > 0, we can find a solution using (1 + ϵ) k centers whose cost is at most a (1 + ϵ)-factor of the optimum and uses at most z outliers. Our algorithms are all based on natural multiswap local search heuristics. We also show that natural local search heuristics that do not violate the number of clusters and outliers for k - median (or k - means ) will have unbounded gap even in Euclidean metrics. Furthermore, we show how our analysis can be extended to general metrics for k - means with outliers to obtain a (25 + ϵ, 1 + ϵ)-approximation: an algorithm that uses at most (1 + ϵ) k clusters and whose cost is at most 25 + ϵ of optimum and uses no more than z outliers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.816

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it