MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963339749 · doi:10.1017/fms.2018.21

PRIME SOLUTIONS TO POLYNOMIAL EQUATIONS IN MANY VARIABLES AND DIFFERING DEGREES

2018· article· en· W2963339749 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueForum of Mathematics Sigma · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsDiophantine equationGeneralizationPolynomialPrime (order theory)Integer (computer science)Degree (music)Type (biology)DiagonalLogarithmPrime numberCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsMathematical analysisGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\mathbf{f}=(f_{1},\ldots ,f_{R})$ be a system of polynomials with integer coefficients in which the degrees need not all be the same. We provide sufficient conditions for which the system of equations $f_{j}(x_{1},\ldots ,x_{n})=0~(1\leqslant j\leqslant R)$ satisfies a general local to global type statement, and has a solution where each coordinate is prime. In fact we obtain the asymptotic formula for number of such solutions, counted with a logarithmic weight, under these conditions. We prove the statement via the Hardy–Littlewood circle method. This is a generalization of the work of Cook and Magyar [‘Diophantine equations in the primes’, Invent. Math. 198 (2014), 701–737], where they obtained the result when the polynomials of $\mathbf{f}$ all have the same degree. Hitherto, results of this type for systems of polynomial equations involving different degrees have been restricted to the diagonal case.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.390
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it