MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963489819

Compact Neural Networks based on the Multiscale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz

2017· article· en· W2963489819 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueUCL Discovery (University College London) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Physics and Python Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnsatzQuantum entanglementRenormalizationScalingConvolutional neural networkQuantumArtificial neural networkFactorizationTensor (intrinsic definition)Invariant (physics)Computer scienceAlgorithmPhysicsStatistical physicsMathematicsArtificial intelligenceQuantum mechanicsPure mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper demonstrates a method for tensorizing neural networks based upon an
\nefficient way of approximating scale invariant quantum states, the Multi-scale Entanglement Renormalization Ansatz (MERA). We employ MERA as a replacement for the
\nfully connected layers in a convolutional neural network and test this implementation on
\nthe CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 datasets. The proposed method outperforms factorization
\nusing tensor trains, providing greater compression for the same level of accuracy and
\ngreater accuracy for the same level of compression. We demonstrate MERA layers with
\n14000 times fewer parameters and a reduction in accuracy of less than 1% compared to
\nthe equivalent fully connected layers, scaling like O(N).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it