MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963531532 · doi:10.1142/s0219199709003491

SCATTERING THEORY FOR THE GROSS–PITAEVSKII EQUATION IN THREE DIMENSIONS

2009· article· en· W2963531532 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Contemporary Mathematics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMathematical analysisDegenerate energy levelsNonlinear systemDegeneracy (biology)Quadratic equationNonlinear Schrödinger equationFourier transformMultiplier (economics)Gross–Pitaevskii equationBilinear interpolationSchrödinger equationGeometryQuantum mechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study the global behavior of small solutions of the Gross–Pitaevskii equation in three dimensions. We prove that disturbances from the constant equilibrium with small, localized energy, disperse for large time, according to the linearized equation. Translated to the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, this implies asymptotic stability of all plane wave solutions for such disturbances. We also prove that every linearized solution with finite energy has a nonlinear solution which is asymptotic to it. The key ingredients are: (1) some quadratic transforms of the solutions, which effectively linearize the nonlinear energy space, (2) a bilinear Fourier multiplier estimate, which allows irregular denominators due to a degenerate non-resonance property of the quadratic interactions, and (3) geometric investigation of the degeneracy in the Fourier space to minimize its influence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.751
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.307
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.103 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it