MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963713505 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.00113

Adjacency matrices of random digraphs: singularity and\n anti-concentration

2015· article· W2963713505 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2015
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicGraph theory and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsAdjacency matrixInvertible matrixVertex (graph theory)GraphDiscrete mathematicsRegular graphLine graphGraph powerPure mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let ${\\mathcal D}_{n,d}$ be the set of all $d$-regular directed graphs on $n$\nvertices. Let $G$ be a graph chosen uniformly at random from ${\\mathcal\nD}_{n,d}$ and $M$ be its adjacency matrix. We show that $M$ is invertible with\nprobability at least $1-C\\ln^{3} d/\\sqrt{d}$ for $C\\leq d\\leq cn/\\ln^2 n$,\nwhere $c, C$ are positive absolute constants. To this end, we establish a few\nproperties of $d$-regular directed graphs. One of them, a Littlewood-Offord\ntype anti-concentration property, is of independent interest. Let $J$ be a\nsubset of vertices of $G$ with $|J|\\approx n/d$. Let $\\delta_i$ be the\nindicator of the event that the vertex $i$ is connected to $J$ and define\n$\\delta = (\\delta_1, \\delta_2, ..., \\delta_n)\\in \\{0, 1\\}^n$. Then for every\n$v\\in\\{0,1\\}^n$ the probability that $\\delta=v$ is exponentially small. This\nproperty holds even if a part of the graph is "frozen".\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.119 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it