MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963776844 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2019114

Explicit estimates on positive supersolutions of nonlinear elliptic equations and applications

2019· article· en· W2963776844 on OpenAlexaff
A. Aghajani, Craig Cowan

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNabla symbolOmegaBounded functionDomain (mathematical analysis)PhysicsCombinatoricsType (biology)Continuous function (set theory)Function (biology)Mathematical physicsMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper we consider positive supersolutions of the nonlinear elliptic equation \begin{document}$ - \Delta u = \rho(x) f(u)|\nabla u|^p, ~~~~ {\rm{ in }}~~~~ \Omega, $\end{document} where $ 0\le p<1 $, $ \Omega $ is an arbitrary domain (bounded or unbounded) in $ {\mathbb{R}}^N $ ($ N\ge 2 $), $ f: [0, a_{f}) \rightarrow {\mathbb{R}}_{+} $ $ (0 < a_{f} \leq +\infty) $ is a non-decreasing continuous function and $ \rho: \Omega \rightarrow \mathbb{R} $ is a positive function. Using the maximum principle we give explicit estimates on positive supersolutions $ u $ at each point $ x\in\Omega $ where $ \nabla u\not\equiv0 $ in a neighborhood of $ x $. As applications, we discuss the dead core set of supersolutions on bounded domains, and also obtain Liouville type results in unbounded domains $ \Omega $ with the property that $ \sup_{x\in\Omega}dist (x, \partial\Omega) = \infty $. In particular when $ \rho(x) = |x|^\beta $ ($ \beta\in {\mathbb{R}} $) and $ f(u) = u^q $ with $ q+p>1 $ then every positive supersolution in an exterior domain is eventually constant if \begin{document}$ (N-2)q+p(N-1)< N+\beta. $\end{document}

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical SystemsSame topicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207