MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963794041 · doi:10.4171/cmh/429

Mean curvature in manifolds with Ricci curvature bounded from below

2018· article· en· W2963794041 on OpenAlexaff
Jaigyoung Choe, Ailana Fraser

Bibliographic record

VenueCommentarii Mathematici Helvetici · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsRicci curvatureScalar curvatureCurvature of Riemannian manifoldsSectional curvatureCurvatureBounded functionRiemann curvature tensorMean curvatureMathematical analysisPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let M be a compact Riemannian manifold of nonnegative Ricci curvature and \Sigma a compact embedded 2-sided minimal hypersurface in M . It is proved that there is a dichotomy: If \Sigma does not separate M then \Sigma is totally geodesic and M\setminus\Sigma is isometric to the Riemannian product \Sigma\times(a,b) , and if \Sigma separates M then the map i_*:\pi_1(\Sigma)\rightarrow \pi_1(M) induced by inclusion is surjective. This surjectivity is also proved for a compact 2-sided hypersurface with mean curvature H\geq(n-1)\sqrt{k} in a manifold of Ricci curvature Ric _M\geq-(n-1)k , k>0 , and for a free boundary minimal hypersurface in an n -dimensional manifold of nonnegative Ricci curvature with nonempty strictly convex boundary. As an application it is shown that a compact (n-1) -dimensional manifold N with the number of generators of \pi_1(N) < n-1 cannot be minimally embedded in the flat torus T^{n} .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommentarii Mathematici HelveticiSame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207