MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964066500 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2018.2847289

State Estimation in Power Distribution Systems Based on Ensemble Kalman Filtering

2018· article· en· W2964066500 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterPhasorSnapshot (computer storage)Electric power systemEstimatorState estimatorEnsemble Kalman filterComputer scienceEstimationState (computer science)Units of measurementPower flowControl theory (sociology)Phasor measurement unitExtended Kalman filterPower (physics)AlgorithmEngineeringMathematicsStatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a past-aware state estimation (PASE) method (for static state estimation) is proposed for power distribution systems, which takes previous estimates into account to improve the accuracy of the current one, using an Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF). Fewer phasor measurements units are needed to achieve the same estimation error target than snapshot-based methods. Furthermore, contrary to existing methods, the proposed approach does not embed power flow equations into the state estimator, thus making it a versatile technique. The theoretical formulation of the EnKF-based PASE presented in the paper has been validated considering a 33-bus distribution system and using power consumption traces from real households.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.977
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it