General systems of linear forms: Equidistribution and true complexity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Higher-order Fourier analysis is a powerful tool that can be used to analyze the densities of linear systems (such as arithmetic progressions) in subsets of Abelian groups. We are interested in the group Fpn, for fixed p and large n, where it is known that analyzing these averages reduces to understanding the joint distribution of a family of sufficiently pseudorandom (formally, high-rank) nonclassical polynomials applied to the corresponding system of linear forms.In this work, we give a complete characterization for these distributions for arbitrary systems of linear forms. This extends previous works which accomplished this in some special cases. As an application, we resolve a conjecture of Gowers and Wolf on the true complexity of linear systems. Our proof deviates from that of the previously known special cases and requires several new ingredients. One of which, which may be of independent interest, is a new theory of homogeneous nonclassical polynomials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it