MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964235292 · doi:10.1017/s0308210509000912

Supports of weight modules over Witt algebras

2011· article· en· W2964235292 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh Section A Mathematics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
FundersVetenskapsrådetNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaWilfrid Laurier UniversityNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSubalgebraWitt algebraAbelian groupMathematicsSimple (philosophy)Pure mathematicsLie algebraSimple moduleBETA (programming language)Witt vectorSpace (punctuation)CombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldDiscrete mathematicsWeightComputer scienceAdjoint representation of a Lie algebra

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As the first step towards a classification of simple weight modules with finite dimensional weight spaces over Witt algebras W n , we explicitly describe the supports of such modules. We also obtain some descriptions of the support of an arbitrary simple weight module over a ℤ n -graded Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$ having a root space decomposition $\smash{\bigoplus_{\alpha\in\mathbb{Z}^n}\mathfrak{g}_\alpha}$ with respect to the abelian subalgebra $\mathfrak{g}_0$ , with the property $\smash{[\mathfrak{g}_\alpha,\mathfrak{g}_\beta] = \mathfrak{g}_{\alpha+\beta}}$ for all α, β ∈ ℤ n , α ≠ β (this class contains the algebra W n ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it