MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2965142132 · doi:10.1109/mis.2019.2932667

Nonlinear Gain Approximation Structure Using Manifold Learning on a Vertical Manipulator

2019· article· en· W2965142132 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Intelligent Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceDimensionality reductionNonlinear systemDimension (graph theory)Representation (politics)Manifold (fluid mechanics)Nonlinear dimensionality reductionReduction (mathematics)Process (computing)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMathematical optimizationMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last decade, researchers have been looking at the problem of analyzing large amounts of data to gauge if there are any inherent relationships present in a N-dimensional vector space. One problem is as the dimension grows, proven statistical analytics fail as the complexity of captured data grows in dimension. This is where reduction methods may be employed to bring the problem at hand down to a representation where conventional methods can produce some tangible results. Manifold learning (ML) algorithms are a class of methods that can be employed on datasets from plant sensors to help optimize a production plant process through data gathered as an example. This research will show ML simulation results on the reduction of a nonlinear gain surface from a vertical linked manipulator. Next, this structure was used to extract nonlinear gain approximations from a practical plant setup.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it