A visible human body slice segmentation method framework based on OneCut and adjacent image geometric features
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As a recent research hot issue, obtaining the accurate 3 D organ models of Visible Human Project (VHP) has many significances. Therefore, how to extract the organ regions of interest (ROI) in the large-scale color slice image data set has become an urgent issue to be solved. In this paper, we propose a method framework based on OneCut algorithm and adjacent image geometric features to continuously extract the main organ regions is proposed. This framework mainly contains two parts: firstly, the OneCut algorithm is used to segment the ROI of target organ in the current image; secondly, the foreground image (obtained ROI) is corroded into several seed points and the background image (other region except for ROI) is refined into a skeleton. Then the obtained seed points and skeleton can be transmitted and mapped onto the next image as the input of OneCut algorithm. Thereby, the serialized slice images can be processed continuously without manual delineating. The experimental results show that the extracted VHP organs are satisfactory. This method framework may provide well technic foundation for other related application.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it