An SDN-Based Caching Decision Policy for Video Caching in Information-Centric Networking
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The considerable increase of multimedia services, such as video-on-demand (VoD) services, is a significant contributor to the total Internet traffic. Software-defined networking (SDN) and information-centric networking (ICN) are two promising technologies that can be combined to facilitate video delivery and to reduce network delays. In this paper, we first formulate the caching decision problem as a 0-1 integer linear programming (ILP) problem. Second, in contrast to existing approaches that solve the formulated ILP problem by assuming all future video requests are known, we consider the impact of the time scale, which transforms the static 0-1 ILP problem into a dynamic problem. By solving the dynamic 0-1 ILP problem, we find more accurate optimal solutions compared to existing approaches. Third, since the formulated 0-1 dynamic ILP problem is NP-hard, we leverage the in-network caching of ICN and the global view of the SDN controller to propose a novel SDN-based caching decision policy. Finally, extensive evaluations are performed, and the results demonstrate that the proposed SDN-based caching decision policy provides solutions that are close to the optimum in substantially less computation time. The SDN-based caching decision policy also outperforms existing practical ICN caching decision policies in terms of the cache hit ratio and the average number of hops, which are directly related to the video delivery latency. Moreover, the SDN-based caching decision policy can substantially reduce the number of generated and broadcasted interest packets, which is a shortcoming of the current ICN.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".