MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968430986 · doi:10.1109/tmtt.2019.2931298

Detection of the Defective Vias in SIW Circuits From Single/Array Probe(s) Data Using Source Reconstruction Method and Machine Learning

2019· article· en· W2968430986 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Innovates - Technology Futures
KeywordsMagnetic fieldElectronic circuitIntegrated circuitElectronic engineeringPrinted circuit boardSubstrate (aquarium)Equivalent circuitMaterials scienceWaveguideAcousticsEngineeringOpticsComputer scienceOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this article, a new approach to detect the defective vias in substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) structures is proposed. First, very near-field radiations of SIW structures are measured using either a single magnetic field probe or a fast electronically switched probe array. A source reconstruction method is utilized to calculate the equivalent electric and magnetic currents on the surface of the SIW structure under investigation. Thereafter, these equivalent sources are used to obtain the magnetic fields very close to the sample boards. A machine learning algorithm is used to distinguish the radiations that are due to the defective vias from those because of radiating parts of the circuit such as feed lines. The simulation and measurement results confirm the validity and accuracy of this high-resolution method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it