MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968510159 · doi:10.1109/jsen.2019.2935324

A Novel Design Framework for Tightly Coupled IMU/GNSS Sensor Fusion Using Inverse-Kinematics, Symbolic Engines, and Genetic Algorithms

2019· article· en· W2968510159 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Sensors Journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInertial Sensor and Navigation
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaElse Kröner-Fresenius-Stiftung
KeywordsGNSS applicationsInertial measurement unitExtended Kalman filterSensor fusionComputer scienceKalman filterGNSS augmentationFilter (signal processing)Noise (video)AlgorithmKinematicsControl theory (sociology)Global Positioning SystemArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tightly-coupled (TC) fusion of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) with Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) is a common technique that provides high-rate positioning even under GNSS interruptions. In order to provide accurate positioning, errors of IMU and GNSS must be modelled and estimated by filtering techniques such as Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). Due to nonlinearity and stochastic characteristics of IMU and GNSS system and measurement models, robust filter design has been a challenge. Conventional design techniques use mission-specific fixed models and trial-and-error noise parameter tuning to design IMU/GNSS filters. These conventional techniques are inflexible and do not always lead to accurate designs as there are no ways to verify the filter ability to estimate sensors errors accurately. To address this challenge, this paper presents a flexible design framework and a systematic procedure for TC IMU/GNSS fusion. The framework utilizes symbolic engines to represent and linearize system and measurement models. Symbolic engines are flexible in new models and fusion algorithms development. In order to evaluate the estimation of sensors errors, an Inverse-Kinematics module is developed to generate error-free sensors measurements which can be contaminated by known errors. The filter parameters are tuned using Genetic Algorithms and the performance is evaluated based on the accuracy of estimating all states including the added known errors. The framework has been used to develop a quaternion-based EKF design and verified on real raw IMU/GNSS data. The results showed that the developed framework greatly reduces efforts to design robust and accurate fusion systems for TC IMU/GNSS integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it