MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2968776414 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2019.2933799

Efficient Time-Domain Sensitivity Analysis of Active Networks

2019· article· en· W2968776414 on OpenAlexafffund
Behzad Nouri, M. Nakhla

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicModel Reduction and Neural Networks
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsSensitivity (control systems)PassivityControl theory (sociology)Electronic circuitStability (learning theory)Differential equationMathematicsSet (abstract data type)Computer scienceReduction (mathematics)Topology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringEngineeringMathematical analysisGeometryControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The conventional sensitivity analysis based on model-order reduction (MOR) techniques guarantees the passivity and, consequently, the stability of the reduced sensitivity circuit provided that the original circuit is passive. This excludes a large class of circuits that are stable but not necessarily passive. In this article, an efficient MOR method is presented for the sensitivity analysis of active stable circuits. The proposed algorithm preserves the stability of both the original and associated sensitivity equations, and is based on reducing the first-order variational equations in the form of a set of stable multi-input differential equations. The sensitivity equations are decomposed into several subsystems of equations where each subsystem contains a dedicated cluster of inputs, thereby avoiding the significant increase in the size of the reduced model due to increasing the number of inputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing TechnologySame topicModel Reduction and Neural NetworksFrench-language works237,207