MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969385932 · doi:10.1145/3385959.3418455

Augmented Unlocking Techniques for Smartphones Using Pre-Touch Information

2020· preprint· en· W2969385932 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSymposium on Spatial User Interaction · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionAuthentication (law)Computer securityMobile devicePrivate information retrievalInternet privacyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Smartphones secure a significant amount of personal and private information, and are playing an increasingly important role in people’s lives. However, current techniques to manually authenticate to smartphones have failed in both not-so-surprising (shoulder surfing) and quite surprising (smudge attacks) ways. In this work, we propose a new technique called 3D Pattern. Our 3D Pattern technique takes advantage of pre-touch sensing, which could soon allow smartphones to sense a user’s finger position at some distance from the screen. We describe and implement the technique, and evaluate it in a small pilot study (n=6) by comparing it to PIN and pattern locks. Our results show that although our prototype takes longer to authenticate, it is completely immune to smudge attacks and promises to be more resistant to shoulder surfing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it