Multiparameter gas sensing with linear hyperspectral absorption tomography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hyperspectral absorption tomography (HAT) reconstructs the distribution of key gas parameters, including composition, pressure, and temperature, from multi-beam absorbance data with numerous spectral resolution elements. There is a nonlinear relationship between the parameters of interest and the spectral absorption coefficient, which must be incorporated into the tomography algorithm. Nonlinear HAT simultaneously reconstructs the composition and temperature of a gas by minimizing a single nonconvex objective function, which combines the light attenuation and spectroscopy models, using a metaheuristic technique. The time required for this computation depends, strongly, on the assumed heuristics, but the high computational cost limits the problem size and, hence, the obtainable spatial resolution. Conversely, linear HAT reconstructs the absorption coefficient for each measurement wavenumber, individually, exploiting the linear structure of the underlying tomography problem. Local spectra are then post-processed with a spectroscopic model to recover multiple parameters. The linear technique enables accurate reconstructions on a high-resolution grid by way of an established statistical imaging algorithm. Moreover, local spectra can be employed to gauge phenomena such as multi-species broadening and line mixing with a calibrated regression model. We simulate linear and nonlinear HAT and reconstruct experimental absorbance data using the former approach to demonstrate its superior performance. Nonlinear reconstructions required a 100-fold computational effort compared to linear HAT. In our experimental test, we reconstructed the mole fraction, pressure, and temperature of water vapor in a stagnation flow, which represents the first three-parameter laser absorption tomography experiment. Simulated and experimental results in our paper make a comprehensive case for linear HAT compared to the nonlinear method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".