MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2969843758 · doi:10.14796/jwmm.c466

Construction Cost-Based Effectiveness Analysis of Green and Grey Infrastructure in Controlling Flood Inundation: A Case Study

2019· article· en· W2969843758 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Water Management Modeling · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFlood Risk Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythGreen infrastructureWater resource managementEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementCivil engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Global climate change and rapid urbanization have increased the frequency of urban flooding. In this work, SWMM was used to simulate the implementation of low impact development (LID) practices, drainage network reconstruction, and detention tanks to evaluate potential reductions in flood severity in the TQ subdistrict of SH city, China. Two assessment indexes, construction costs and construction effectiveness, were used to evaluate model results for three scenarios. Construction effectiveness was quantified by reductions in total flood volume and peak flow rate. Results show that LID practices such as permeable pavement and sunken green space mitigate the flooding by reducing total flood volume by 8.6% and decreasing surface runoff by 7.9%, at a cost of $0.34 million. Reconstructing the drainage network reduced total flood volume by 38.4%, which is less than the 46.6% given by detention storage construction. However, the peak flow for drainage network reconstruction decreased by 46.6% and peak flow for detention construction was reduced by 50.1%. Despite the lower peak flows, three nodes experienced flood durations longer than the general guideline of 1 h for network reconstruction, while only two nodes did so with detention tanks. Thus, detention tanks are more effective in reducing the effects of flooding than drainage network reconstruction. Detention tanks are also more cost effective, costing $1.59 million, while network reconstruction cost $1.74 million. While this study considers flood risk reduc-tion only in regard to economics and effectiveness, the benefits extend to the environment, ecology and human populations. Consequently, this paper can be used as a guide for planners and engineers who make flood mitigation decisions in using these techniques for balancing construction costs and effectiveness. This study should be meaningful for urban stormwater system design, planning, and construction in other southeastern cities of China with high water coverage ratios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it