MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2970733504 · doi:10.1016/j.dib.2019.104462

Dataset on water quality characteristics of a hill stream in Bhaderwah, Jammu and Kashmir

2019· article· en· W2970733504 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ravinder Kumar, Anil K. Raina, Neeraj Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueData in Brief · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSouth Asian Studies and Conflicts
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Jammu
KeywordsTributaryTurbidityWater qualityEnvironmental sciencePollutionHydrology (agriculture)Channel (broadcasting)GeographyEcologyGeologyBiologyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article summarises the data on water quality characteristics of Neeru stream analysed monthly for two years on a seasonal basis averaged to one year. Twenty-five water samples were collected and analysed to understand the quality of water based on index parameters. The data indicates marked variations in the concentration of most constituents mostly in the urban and suburban sections of the stream. The values for Canadian Water Quality Index (CWQI) were within acceptable range except for turbidity and nickel. The tributaries T-1, T-3 (III) and T-4 flowing close to urban settlement revealed relatively high levels of pollution (WQI:85-90), while T-3 (II) bisecting Bhaderwah town was heavily polluted (WQI:82.97). The main water channel (MC-1 to MC-10) with moderate to heavy pollution load in the middle and lower sections revealed reasonably good water quality (WQI 90-95).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score0.166

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.007
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueData in BriefSame topicSouth Asian Studies and ConflictsFrench-language works237,207