Triplet‐State Position and Crystal‐Field Tuning in Opto‐Magnetic Lanthanide Complexes: Two Sides of the Same Coin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lanthanide-complex-based luminescence thermometry and single-molecule magnetism are two effervescent fields of research, owing to the great promise they hold from an application standpoint. The high thermal sensitivity achievable, their contactless nature, along with sub-micrometric spatial resolution make these luminescent thermometers appealing for accurate temperature probing in miniaturised electronics. To that end, single-molecule magnets (SMMs) are expected to revolutionise the field of spintronics, thanks to the improvements made in terms of their working temperature-now surpassing that of liquid nitrogen-and manipulation of their spin state. Hence, the combination of such opto-magnetic properties in a single molecule is desirable in the aim of overcoming, among others, addressability issues. Yet, improvements must be made through design strategies for the realisation of the aforementioned goal. Moving forward from these considerations, we present a thorough investigation of the effect that changes in the ligand scaffold of a family of terbium complexes have on their performance as luminescent thermometers and SMMs. In particular, an increased number of electron-withdrawing groups yields modifications of the metal coordination environment and a lowering of the triplet state of the ligands. These effects are tightly intertwined, thus, resulting in concomitant variations of the SMM and the luminescence thermometry behaviour of the complexes. Supported by ab initio calculations, we can rationally interpret the observed trends and provide solid foundations for the development of opto-magnetic lanthanide complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it