MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2971394479 · doi:10.1109/codit.2019.8820298

An Improved K-medoids Algorithm Based on Binary Sequences Similarity Measures

2019· article· en· W2971394479 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceMedoidSimilarity (geometry)Binary numberEuclidean distanceData miningk-medoidsBinary dataAlgorithmFuzzy clusteringCURE data clustering algorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays a massive amount of data is generated as the development of technology and services has accelerated. Therefore, the demand for data clustering in order to gain knowledge has increased in many sectors such as medical sciences, risk assessment and product sales. Moreover, binary data has been widely used in various applications including market basket data and text documents. While applying classic widely used k-means method is inappropriate to cluster binary data, this work proposes an improvement of K-medoids algorithm using binary similarity measures instead of Euclidean distance which is generally deployed in clustering algorithms. We have considered two challenging applications, namely; text clustering and binary images categorization to show the merits of the proposed framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it