Incremental Graph Processing for On-line Analytics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern data generation is enormous; we now capture events at increasingly fine granularity, and require processing at rates approaching real-time. For graph analytics, this explosion in data volumes and processing demands has not been matched by improved algorithmic or infrastructure techniques. Instead of exploring solutions to keep up with the velocity of the generated data, most of today's systems focus on analyzing individually built historic snapshots. Modern graph analytics pipelines must evolve to become viable at massive scale, and move away from static, post-processing scenarios to support on-line analysis. This paper presents our progress towards a system that analyzes dynamic incremental graphs, responsive at single-change granularity. We present an algorithmic structure using principles of recursive updates and monotonic convergence, and a set of incremental graph algorithms that can be implemented based on this structure. We also present the required middleware to support graph analytics at fine, event-level granularity. We envision that graph topology changes are processed asynchronously, concurrently, and independently (without shared state), converging an algorithm's state (e.g. single-source shortest path distances, connectivity analysis labeling) to its deterministic answer. The expected long-term impact of this work is to enable a transition away from offline graph analytics, allowing knowledge to be extracted from networked systems in real-time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it