Design of a mutually coupled external‐rotor direct drive E‐bike switched reluctance motor
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a concentrated‐wound exterior‐rotor direct‐drive electric bicycle (e‐bike) mutually coupled switched reluctance motor (MCSRM) has been designed to match the performance parameters and dimensional constraints of a commercially available permanent magnet e‐bike motor. Different stator and rotor pole configurations are compared for a 3‐phase MCSRM. During the design process, many parameters have been evaluated and analysed. The finalised performance capabilities of all pole configurations are summarised, and the choice of pole configuration for the final design is justified. The full dynamic torque‐speed performance of the finalised 15/10 MCSRM is presented, along with a detailed thermal analysis. Finally, the MCSRM performance is compared to a 12/16 non‐coupled SRM and a commercially available permanent magnet motor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it