A Systematic Gene‐Centric Approach to Define Haplotypes and Identify Alleles on the Basis of Dense Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Datasets
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
CORE IDEAS: A gene-centric approach for haplotype definition was developed and implemented in R. The tool allows for allelic characterization at given loci in germplasm collections. Allelic status at four maturity genes is predicted on the basis of marker genotyping data. Assessing the allelic diversity within a germplasm collection and identifying individuals carrying favorable alleles is challenging. Advances in high-throughput technologies allow the genotyping of many individuals for thousands of markers but bridging the gap between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and relevant alleles remains difficult. We developed a systematic approach that defines haplotypes from large SNP catalogs that aims to identify haplotypes that can be equated to alleles at given genes. Unlike haplotype visualization tools, our approach selects SNP markers that flank a gene and define haplotypes that correspond to this gene's alleles. We tested this approach on four known soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] maturity genes (E1, GmGia, GmPhyA3, and GmPhyA2) in a collection of 67 lines and two genotypic datasets [a SNP array and genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS)]. For E1, GmGia, and GmPhyA3, we identified SNP haplotypes such that the allele found at these genes could be accurately predicted from the haplotype in 97.3% of the cases. For these genes, of the 12 known alleles in the collection, 10 and 8 could be correctly predicted from the haplotypes found with the SNP array and GBS datasets, with success rates of 98 and 97% for all allele-line combinations, respectively. The approach proved equally successful for data derived from a SNP array and GBS. However, in the case of GmPhyA2, a lack of markers in the genomic region prevented the identification of alleles, regardless of the dataset. We demonstrate the feasibility and reproducibility of our approach and identify limits to its applicability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it