MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972407345 · doi:10.23919/acc.2019.8814309

Constrained control Lyapunov function construction via approximation of static Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations

2019· article· en· W2972407345 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdaptive Dynamic Programming Control
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHamilton–Jacobi–Bellman equationNonlinear systemMathematicsLyapunov functionClassification of discontinuitiesOptimal controlBellman equationApplied mathematicsViscosity solutionMathematical optimizationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we study the problem of constructing Lyapunov functions for nonlinear input-constrained systems with the largest possible stability regions by using a solution of the associated Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) PDE. To solve this equation, we employ a finite difference approximation and novel boundary conditions based on a recently-developed algorithmic construction of the boundary of the system's null controllable region, which efficiently determines all reachable states. Furthermore, since even smooth HJB PDEs are observed to contain discontinuities, the artificial viscosity perturbation method is used to improve the quality of the approximation. The sub-problem of determining the optimal constrained input at each node is reduced to finding the roots of a certain nonlinear polynomial. Lastly, we illustrate the results using simulation examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.978
Threshold uncertainty score0.746

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Dynamic Programming ControlFrench-language works237,207