Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The western Roman empire left a double cultural legacy: Christianity, of a kind which acknowledged the authority of the bishop of Rome, and Latin, the language of Roman Christianity. This chapter tells the story of lexicography in the lands where Roman Christianity was practised and the Latin language was read. These lands correspond roughly with modern western and central Europe, but the concept ‘Europe’ was not in general use until the very end of this period, and need not distract us here. The Islamic and Orthodox neighbours of Latin Christendom had their own lexicographical traditions, which are treated in Chapters 8, 11, and 12. Within Latin Christendom, Jews contributed to the lexicography of at least three vernacular languages (French, Italian, and Czech), and these contributions are documented here, but the learned Jewish tradition of Hebrew lexicography is treated separately in Chapter 9. The pagans on the edges of Christendom were illiterate, and became literate only as they became Christian.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it