MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972617630 · doi:10.1109/cjece.2019.2895047

Low-Power Highly Reliable SET-Induced Dual-Node Upset-Hardened Latch and Flip-Flop

2019· article· en· W2972617630 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Riadul Islam

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadiation Effects in Electronics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMichigan Space Grant Consortium
KeywordsFlip-flopUpsetNode (physics)TransistorPower–delay productSoft errorComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringMaterials scienceVoltageElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsCMOSPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It appears that the relentless pursuit of Moore's law scaling from one generation of process technology to the next increases circuit vulnerability to single-event transient (SET)-induced double-node upset (SEDU). In this paper, we present a novel SEDU-hardened latch. The latch consists of a new 16-transistor (16T) SEDU-hardened storage cell and a C-type output buffer. The latch exhibits 25% lower power consumption, is 81% faster, and also shows 86% lower power-delay product than the existing SEDU-hardened latches. In addition, we present the first SEDU-hardened flip-flop that exhibits negative hold time. The proposed SEDU-hardened flip-flop is 29% faster, consumes 50% lower dynamic power and 25% lower static power, has 45% lower setup time, and uses 27% lower area than the existing partial SEDU-hardened flip-flop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.157
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicRadiation Effects in ElectronicsFrench-language works237,207