MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2972765094 · doi:10.1109/mic.2019.2941391

Contextual, Behavioral, and Biometric Signatures for Continuous Authentication

2019· article· en· W2972765094 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet Computing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUser Authentication and Security Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiometricsComputer sciencePasswordAuthentication (law)GestureHuman–computer interactionFingerprint (computing)AccelerometerSpoofing attackBehavioral patternGlobal Positioning SystemMobile deviceComputer securityWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Continuous authentication in the Mobile Internet of Things should be based as broadly as possible, since a wide range of factors continuously reveal unexpected correlations. Such factors may include captured events (e.g., password, fingerprint, application start and end, network connect, and disconnect), continuous time series (e.g., gesture, typing rate, accelerometer, GPS, ambient sound, light levels, and time-of-day), and derived behavioral features (e.g., user sociability, browser and application menus, application choice). All these factors have been shown to correlate with the actual user identity, often in surprising combinations. More and more sensors are being deployed in autonomous devices, smart environments and vehicles, enabling even further behavioral and contextual data to be analyzed. The pegs of this continuous authentication “big tent” are moving out further than ever before, bringing it closer to practical uses in our everyday lives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score0.544

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it