MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973085650 · doi:10.51401/jinteks.v1i1.371

APLIKASI PELAYANAN ADMINISTRASI DESA KARANG DIMA BERBASIS WEB

2019· article· id· W2973085650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Informatika Teknologi dan Sains (Jinteks) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLocal Governance and Development
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Saat ini teknologi sangat berperan penting dalam semua bidang, salah satunya dalam bidang Administrasi. Desa Karang Dima merupakan salah satu desa yang berada di Kecamatan Labuhan Badas, mempunyai luas wilayah 32,14 pada tahun 2018. Desa Karang Dima mempunyai 2.047 kepala keluarga dengan jumlah penduduk 6.951 jiwa.Penelitian ini bertujuan menyelsaikan masalah yang ada dalam Pelayanan Administrasi di Desa Karang Dima dengan merancang dan membangun Aplikasi Pelayanan Administrasi Penduduk. Aplikasi ini fokus pada pelayanan Administrasi (pembuatan surat) agar proses yang dilakukan lebih mudah dan cepat sehingga dapat memuaskan masyarakat dalam pelayanan administrasi oleh staf Desa Karang Dima. Aplikasi berbasis WEB dikembangkan menggunakan bahasa pemrograman PHP dengan menggunakan Mysql sebagai database. Metode pengembangan perangkat lunak menggunakan metode Waterfall. Pengujian perangkat lunak dilakukan melalui pengujian Black-Box. Hasil akhir dari penelitian ini adalahAplikasi Pelayanan Administrasi Desa Karang Dima Berbasis Web yang dapat membantu Admin Desa dalam memberikan pelayanan administrasi kepada warga desa secara cepat dan tepat.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.776
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it