MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973110913 · doi:10.1103/physreve.100.032209

Solitary waves in a nonintegrable chain with double-well potentials

2019· article· en· W2973110913 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. E · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNonlinear Photonic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAzrieli FoundationIsrael Science Foundation
KeywordsSpinodalPhysicsBistabilityLattice (music)Nonlinear systemDisjoint setsScalar (mathematics)Phase (matter)Phase transitionMathematical analysisMeasure (data warehouse)Elastic energyClassical mechanicsMathematicsCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study solitary waves in a one-dimensional lattice of identical masses that are connected in series by nonlinear springs. The potential of each spring is nonconvex, where two disjoint convex regions, phase I and phase II, are separated by a concave, spinodal region. Consequently, the force-strain relation of the spring is nonmonotonous, which gives rise to a bistable behavior. Based on analytical treatment, with some approximations, combined with extensive numerical simulations, we are able to reveal important insights. For example, we find that the solitary-wave solution is indifferent to the energy barrier that separates the two energy wells associated with phase I and phase II, and that the shape of the wave can be described by means of merely two scalar properties of the potential of the springs, namely, the ratio of stiffness in phase II and phase I, and the ratio between the Maxwell's force and corresponding transition strain. The latter ratio provides a useful measure for the significance of the spinodal region. Linear stability of the solitary-wave solution is studied analytically using the Vakhitov-Kolokolov criterion applied to the approximate solutions obtained in the first part. These results are validated by numerical simulations. We find that the solitary-wave solution is stable provided that its velocity is higher than some critical value. It is shown that, practically, the solitary waves are stable for almost the entire range of possible wave velocities. This is also manifested in the interaction between two solitary waves or between a solitary wave and a wall (rigid boundary). Such interaction results in a minor change of height and shape of the solitary wave along with the formation of a trail of small undulations that follow the wave, as expected in a nonintegrable system. Even after a significant number of interactions the changes in the wave height and shape are minor, suggesting that the bistable chain may be a useful platform for delivering information over long distances, even concurrently with additional information (other solitary waves) passing through the chain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.629
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it