Fast and Efficient Convolutional Accelerator for Edge Computing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a vital approach in machine learning. However, their high complexity and energy consumption make them challenging to embed in mobile applications at the edge requiring real-time processes such as smart phones. In order to meet the real-time constraint of edge devices, recently proposed custom hardware CNN accelerators have exploited parallel processing elements (PEs) to increase throughput. However, this straightforward parallelization of PEs and high memory bandwidth require high data movement, leading to large energy consumption. As a result, only a certain number of PEs can be instantiated when designing bandwidth-limited custom accelerators targeting edge devices. While most bandwidth-limited designs claim a peak performance of a few hundred giga operations per second, their average runtime performance is substantially lower than their roofline when applied to state-of-the-art CNNs such as AlexNet, VGGNet and ResNet, as a result of low resource utilization and arithmetic intensity. In this work, we propose a zero-activation-skipping convolutional accelerator (ZASCA) that avoids noncontributory multiplications with zero-valued activations. ZASCA employs a dataflow that minimizes the gap between its average and peak performances while maximizing its arithmetic intensity for both sparse and dense representations of activations, targeting the bandwidth-limited edge computing scenario. More precisely, ZASCA achieves a performance efficiency of up to 94 percent over a set of state-of-the-art CNNs for image classification with dense representation where the performance efficiency is the ratio between the average runtime performance and the peak performance. Using its zero-skipping feature, ZASCA can further improve the performance efficiency of the state-of-the-art CNNs by up to 1.9× depending on the sparsity degree of activations. The implementation results in 65-nm TSMC CMOS technology show that, compared to the most energy-efficient accelerator, ZASCA can process convolutions from 5.5× to 17.5× faster, and is between 2.1× and 4.5× more energy efficient while occupying 2.1× less silicon area.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".