MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2973835677 · doi:10.1109/iri.2019.00066

Fake News Detection Using Bayesian Inference

2019· article· en· W2973835677 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultinomial distributionMarkov chain Monte CarloExponential familyComputer scienceDirichlet distributionBayesian probabilityBayesian inferenceInferenceArtificial intelligenceMixture modelMachine learningGibbs samplingAlgorithmData miningMathematicsEconometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given the huge volume of information available on social media, making a distinction between false information and a real one is a challenging task. In fact, several statistical models dealing with this problem are based on multinomial distributions. However, a new family of distributions that is an exponential family approximation to the Dirichlet Compound Multinomial (EDCM) has been introduced to be more adjustable to high-dimensional data and to overcome the drawbacks of the multinomial assumption. Thus, in this paper, we tackle the problem of fake news detection using finite mixture models of EDCM distributions. In particular, we develop a Bayesian approach based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for the learning of these mixture models. The proposed method is validated via extensive simulations and a comparison with multinomial-based mixture models is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207