MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2974094309 · doi:10.1049/hve.2019.0113

Classification of common discharges in outdoor insulation using acoustic signals and artificial neural network

2019· article· en· W2974094309 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHigh Voltage · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicHigh voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulator (electricity)Artificial neural networkAcousticsCeramicElectric power transmissionMaterials scienceElectrical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringComposite materialArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Condition monitoring of outdoor insulation systems is crucial to the integrity of distribution and transmission overhead lines and substations. The objective of this study is to use a commercial acoustic sensor along with artificial neural network (ANN), to classify different typical types of discharges in outdoor insulation systems. First, ANN was used to distinguish between five common electrical discharges that were generated under controlled conditions. Next, this approach was extended to include outdoor ceramic insulators. Three types of defects were tested under laboratory conditions, i.e. a crack in the ceramic disc, surface pollution discharge, and corona near the insulator surface. Both a single disc, and three discs connected in an insulator string were tested with respect to these defects. For both controlled samples and full insulators, a recognition rate of more than 85% was achieved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it