Asynchronous Acoustic Localization and Tracking for Mobile Targets
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, acoustic-based indoor localization has attracted much attention due to its affordable infrastructure costs and high localization accuracy. However, previous work is infeasible in mobile target tracking for its long latency in obtaining sufficient beacon messages. In addition, the performance can further deteriorate due to device diversity, varying channel gains, and background noises. To this end, we propose an asynchronous acoustic localization and tracking system (AALTS), which utilizes distributed acoustic anchor nodes to locate passive off-the-shelf mobile devices. In AALTS, we propose an orthogonal chirp spread spectrum (OCSS) modulation technique, which doubles the data rate and thus mitigates the latency. We design a more robust method to capture acoustic signals which embody timestamps for localization, accounting for device diversity, varying channel gains, and the multipath effect. Finally, we incorporate an acoustic Doppler speed estimation module with a path-based particle filter framework to accurately track the moving targets. We have evaluated AALTS in an indoor testbed of size 8×12 m2with commodity mobile phones and customized acoustic anchors. Our evaluation results demonstrate remarkable performance: AALTS achieves 90-percentile tracking errors of 0.49 m for mobile targets and a median of 0.12 m for stationary ones with only four anchor nodes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".