MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2978174540 · doi:10.1109/tap.2019.2944216

Spacetime Metamaterials—Part II: Theory and Applications

2019· article· en· W2978174540 on OpenAlexaff
Christophe Caloz, Zoé-Lise Deck-Léger

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpacetimePhysicsMetamaterialSpacetime symmetriesMaxwell's equations in curved spacetimeTheoretical physicsOpticsQuantum field theory in curved spacetimeQuantum mechanicsTheory of relativityMathematics of general relativityNumerical relativity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The overall article presents the authors' vision of the emerging field of spacetime metamaterials, and related systems, in a cohesive and pedagogical perspective, systematically building up the physics, modeling, and applications of these media upon the foundation of their pure-space and pure-time counterparts. Following the first part, dealing with the general concepts underpinning spacetime metamaterials, this part establishes the theory of spacetime metamaterials and overviews some of their current and potential applications. It first describes the scattering phenomenology of a spacetime interface, the building brick of any spacetime metamaterial, and deduces the corresponding electromagnetic boundary conditions. Upon this basis, it derives the spacetime interface scattering (Fresnel-like) coefficients and frequency transitions, and subsequently generalizes time reversal to spacetime compansion (compression and expansion). Then, it illustrates the new physics of spacetime metamaterials with the examples of spacetime mirrors and cavities, the inverse prism and chromatic birefringence, and spacetime crystals. Next, it discusses various applications-categorized as frequency multiplication and mixing, matching and filtering, nonreciprocity and absorption, cloaking, electromagnetic processing, and radiation. Finally, the conclusion section provides a list of eight items that concisely summarizes the key results of this article, in completion to the list related to the general concepts in Part I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations275
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and PropagationSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207