MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979310116 · doi:10.1145/3358196

Cache Locking Content Selection Algorithms for ARINC-653 Compliant RTOS

2019· article· en· W2979310116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCachePartition (number theory)Embedded systemCache algorithmsMulti-core processorSoftwareOperating systemAvionicsReal-time operating systemAUTOSARParallel computingCPU cacheDistributed computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avionic software is the subject of stringent real time, determinism and safety constraints. Software designers face several challenges, one of them being the interferences that appear in common situations, such as resource sharing. The interferences introduce non-determinism and delays in execution time. One of the main interference prone resources are cache memories. In single-core processors, caches comprise multiple private levels. This breaks the isolation principle imposed by avionic standards, such as the ARINC-653. This standard defines partitioned architectures where one partition should never directly interfere with another one. In cache-based architectures, one partition can modify the cache content of another partition. In this paper, we propose a method based on cache locking to reduce the non-determinism and the contention on lower level memories while improving the time performances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it