An end‐user‐centric test generation methodology for performance evaluation of mobile networked applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary We propose a model‐based test generation methodology to evaluate the impact of the interaction of the wireless network and application configurations on the performance of mobile networked applications. We consider waiting time delay to model wireless network quality. We classify mobile applications into two groups. Group I represents applications where end‐user experience is mainly affected by waiting time delay during service consumption, while group II represents applications where end‐user experience is affected by waiting time delay before service consumption. Test generation is formulated as an inversion problem. However, for group I applications, solving the inversion problem is expensive. Therefore, we utilize metamorphic testing to mitigate the cost of test oracles. We formulate metamorphic test generation as maximization of the distance between seed and follow‐up test cases. Two test coverage criteria are proposed: user experience and user‐experience‐and‐input interaction. Network models are developed for a mobile device that has network access through a WiFi hot spot and uses either transmission control protocol or user datagram protocol. Two mobile applications are used to demonstrate the methodology: multimedia streaming and web browsing. Application of the methodology when user actions are taken into consideration is also addressed. The effectiveness of the methodology is evaluated using two metrics: the incurred time cost and redundancy in the generated test suite. The obtained results show the advantage of casting test generation as an inversion problem, compared with random testing. For apps with intensive performance models, combining metamorphic testing with the methodology has tremendously reduced the cost of test oracles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".