MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2979382636 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2019.2946512

Universal Approximation of Fuzzy Relation Models by Semitensor Product

2019· article· en· W2979382636 on OpenAlexafffund
Hongli Lyu, Wilson Wang, Xiaoping Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFuzzy Logic and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFuzzy logicMIMORelation (database)Fuzzy control systemNeuro-fuzzyMathematicsNonlinear systemExpression (computer science)Fuzzy associative matrixMatrix (chemical analysis)Control theory (sociology)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceData mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A universal approximation of multi-input multi-output (MIMO) fuzzy systems is proposed in this article based on a fuzzy relation matrix (FRM) method. The fuzzy reasoning operation in FRM is realized by the semitensor product (STP) technique. The theoretical proof is provided to estimate approximation accuracy of the FRM models for MIMO systems. Its effectiveness is verified by simulation. Simulation results show that the proposed fuzzy design technology is efficient for fuzzy systems modeling, and the general universal approximation theory can be extended to the MIMO fuzzy systems. The proposed uniform matrix expression can be used to design fuzzy systems with FRM models and to approximate nonlinear functions with required accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy SystemsSame topicFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207