A Distributed Tensor-Train Decomposition Method for Cyber-Physical-Social Services
Bibliographic record
Abstract
C yber- P hysical- S ocial S ystems (CPSS) integrating the cyber, physical, and social worlds is a key technology to provide proactive and personalized services for humans. In this paper, we studied CPSS by taking h uman- i nteraction-aware b ig d ata (HIBD) as the starting point. However, the HIBD collected from all aspects of our daily lives are of high-order and large-scale, which bring ever-increasing challenges for their cleaning, integration, processing, and interpretation. Therefore, new strategies for representing and processing of HIBD become increasingly important in the provision of CPSS services. As an emerging technique, tensor is proving to be a suitable and promising representation and processing tool of HIBD. In particular, tensor networks, as a significant tensor decomposition technique, bring advantages of computing, storage, and applications of HIBD. Furthermore, T ensor- T rain (TT), a type of tensor network, is particularly well suited for representing and processing high-order data by decomposing a high-order tensor into a series of low-order tensors. However, at present, there is still need for an efficient Tensor-Train decomposition method for massive data. Therefore, for larger-scale HIBD, a highly-efficient computational method of Tensor-Train is required. In this paper, a d istributed T ensor- T rain (DTT) decomposition method is proposed to process the high-order and large-scale HIBD. The high performance of the proposed DTT such as the execution time is demonstrated with a case study on a typical form of CPSS data, C omputed T omography (CT) image data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".