A non-group parallel frequent pattern mining algorithm based on conditional patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Frequent itemset mining serves as the main method of association rule mining. With the limitations in computing space and performance, the association of frequent items in large data mining requires both extensive time and effort, particularly when the datasets become increasingly larger. In the process of associated data mining in a big data environment, the MapReduce programming model is typically used to perform task partitioning and parallel processing, which could improve the execution efficiency of the algorithm. However, to ensure that the associated rule is not destroyed during task partitioning and parallel processing, the inner-relationship data must be stored in the computer space. Because inner-relationship data are redundant, storage of these data will significantly increase the space usage in comparison with the original dataset. In this study, we find that the formation of the frequent pattern (FP) mining algorithm depends mainly on the conditional pattern bases. Based on the parallel frequent pattern (PFP) algorithm theory, the grouping model divides frequent items into several groups according to their frequencies. We propose a non-group PFP (NG-PFP) mining algorithm that cancels the grouping model and reduces the data redundancy between sub-tasks. Moreover, we present the NG-PFP algorithm for task partition and parallel processing, and its performance in the Hadoop cluster environment is analyzed and discussed. Experimental results indicate that the non-group model shows obvious improvement in terms of computational efficiency and the space utilization rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".